Optimizing GitHub Actions: Conditional Job Triggers and Workflow Organization #141548
-
Select Topic AreaQuestion BodyI’m working on setting up a GitHub Actions workflow for our project, but I’m a bit stuck. I understand the basics of using jobs and steps, but I’m trying to figure out how to optimize the workflow’s efficiency. Specifically, I want to avoid rerunning jobs when nothing has changed in a certain directory. Do you have any insights on how to handle that? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
Good question, my man, @AlaricThorn. Optimizing workflows is important for saving time and resources. In GitHub Actions, you can conditionally trigger jobs based on path changes, which seems to be exactly what you’re looking for. You’ll want to make use of the paths filter within the workflow triggers. Here’s a quick rundown:
on:
push:
paths:
- 'src/**' This will only trigger the workflow when files within the src directory change. But that’s at the workflow level.
Here’s a common pattern: jobs:
example-job:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Check out code
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Run job only if certain files changed
if: ${{ contains(github.event.head_commit.message, 'specific-directory') }}
run: echo "Changes detected in specific-directory" This approach gives you flexibility at both the workflow and job level. If you find that you’re constantly filtering jobs, you might want to consider splitting up your workflows entirely to handle specific directories independently. Another advanced option is using GitHub’s paths-ignore filter to skip certain files or directories. This can help if you need the workflow to run more often but exclude irrelevant changes (like documentation updates). See if this helps you. Just ping me for more examples on setting up conditional triggers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I kinda understood it and it gave me a better perspective, thanks! I have one more question though: what if I have two directories that I want to monitor separately within the same workflow? Say, one for backend changes and one for frontend. Would it be better to handle these in the same workflow with conditional steps, or split them into two separate workflows? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It depends on the dependencies between those two parts. If the backend and frontend changes are often related and you need a coordinated deployment or test setup, keeping them within the same workflow makes sense. You can separate the jobs with conditions like I mentioned earlier, using paths and if conditions to differentiate between them: on:
push:
paths:
- 'backend/**'
- 'frontend/**'
jobs:
backend-job:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.event.commits.some(commit => commit.modified.some(file => file.startsWith('backend/'))) }}
steps:
# backend specific steps
frontend-job:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.event.commits.some(commit => commit.modified.some(file => file.startsWith('frontend/'))) }}
steps:
# frontend specific steps But if the two are fairly independent, separating them into distinct workflows has advantages:
All clear? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This helped me a lot! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It depends on the dependencies between those two parts.
If the backend and frontend changes are often related and you need a coordinated deployment or test setup, keeping them within the same workflow makes sense. You can separate the jobs with conditions like I mentioned earlier, using paths and if conditions to differentiate between them: