Replies: 1 comment
-
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Github automatically generates the name of each "job" based on the hierarchical path of actions. If action
Foo
calls actionBar
calls actionBaz
, then the resulting job name isFoo / Bar / Baz
.This gets worse if any of these is a "matrix" job, in which case the exact parameters of the matrix are also added in parentheses:
Foo (a, b) / Bar (c, d) / Baz (e, f)
.For any moderately complex CI/CD pipeline, this gets out of hand very quickly, very often resulting in duplicate information as matrix parameters are passed through:
Is there any way to make these less verbose?
There is a workaround I have found, by making the
name:
field in jobs some kind of "dynamic" string (static names don't work1):Which looks... okay...:
But then this break the hierarchical view of the jobs in the summary view:
New:
vs old:
Footnotes
''
or${{ '' }}
), because then Github just uses the default naming scheme (job/step name + list of arguments)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions