Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Change order of definitions :) graph TD
candidate_opinion --> B["(batch_size, 1, feature_size)"]
opinion_denominator --> candidate_opinion_rep["candidate_opinion_rep(batch_size, feature_size)"]
candidate_opinion[/"candidate_opinion(batch_size, seq_len)"/] --"sum(-1)"--> candidate_opinion_sum
candidate_opinion_sum --> opinion_denominator
B --> candidate_opinion_rep
aspect_input_ids[/aspect_input_ids/] --> Bert
aspect_token_type_ids[/aspect_token_type_ids/] --> Bert
aspect_attention_mask[/aspect_attention_mask/] --> Bert
Bert --> pooled_outputs["pooled_outputs (batch_size,seq_len,feature_size)"]
candidate_aspect[/"candidate_aspect(batch_size, seq_len)"/] --"sum(-1)"--> candidate_aspect_sum["candidate_aspect_sum(batch_size, )"]
candidate_aspect_sum --> aspect_denominator
candidate_aspect --> A["(batch_size, 1, feature_size)"]
A --> candidate_aspect_rep
aspect_denominator --> candidate_aspect_rep["candidate_opinion_rep(batch_size, feature_size)"]
pooled_outputs --> A
pooled_outputs --> B
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I'm not sure, but I keep changing the order of statements in the hope it
fixes itself :)
чт, 16 мая 2024 г. в 04:57, GodsDusk ***@***.***>:
… is there any principles? or just keep trying manually?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4045 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGGWLQTFTKRZIWEI3YL24DZCQG7HAVCNFSM6AAAAAAUKUMM66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TINJSGI2DK>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
there are two lines crossed left, how to avoid them?
here is the raw code:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions