Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Qfactor feature support #17

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 16, 2021
Merged

Qfactor feature support #17

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 16, 2021

Conversation

osamu620
Copy link
Owner

Fix #12

This PR enables the Qfactor feature which is described in the HTJ2K white paper (https://htj2k.com/wp-content/uploads/white-paper.pdf)

Now you can use Qfactor=quality option with an integer in the range from 0 (lowest quality) to 100 (highest quality). The quality value is very similar to the one in many JPEG encoder implementations.

@osamu620 osamu620 merged commit e3170b5 into main Jul 16, 2021
@osamu620 osamu620 deleted the feature_qfactor branch July 16, 2021 03:01
@boxerab
Copy link
Contributor

boxerab commented Jul 16, 2021

Nice!

@osamu620 osamu620 restored the feature_qfactor branch July 16, 2021 03:11
@osamu620 osamu620 deleted the feature_qfactor branch July 16, 2021 03:14
@osamu620
Copy link
Owner Author

Nice!

Enjoy!
Actually, the current way of main header construction with the Qfactor feature has room for improvement. I will work on this in the near future.

@boxerab
Copy link
Contributor

boxerab commented Jul 16, 2021

Actually, the current way of main header construction with the Qfactor feature has room for improvement. I will work on this in the near future.

Sounds good, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rate control
2 participants