Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Redesign to match modern plex clients #143

Open
JonzaUK opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Feature Request: Redesign to match modern plex clients #143

JonzaUK opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@JonzaUK
Copy link

JonzaUK commented Sep 4, 2024

Feature Request for a redesign to match modern plex clients UX design. feels like PM4K is showing its age in the design department, might just be my opinion but I think a design matching the look of modern would look amazing.

@pannal
Copy link
Owner

pannal commented Sep 4, 2024

Yeah. That's in the back of my mind but very far in the future. Being mostly the only active maintainer, this is a huge endeavor.

Maybe in some future version, or if someone else tackles it.

@pannal pannal added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Sep 4, 2024
@firasdib
Copy link

Can you add some documentation on how to get started? There is nothing in the readme.

@zenhuw
Copy link

zenhuw commented Jan 3, 2025

I want to start with OSD UI , will try working on it in the next few months

@pannal
Copy link
Owner

pannal commented Jan 3, 2025

I want to start with OSD UI , will try working on it in the next few months

Haha, that's probably the "most modern" part of the PM4K UI :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants