Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancing? presentation of searches #50

Open
jcowey opened this issue May 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Enhancing? presentation of searches #50

jcowey opened this issue May 23, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@jcowey
Copy link
Member

jcowey commented May 23, 2019

This is about the filter possibilities in "Collection".
I shall use as an example the search taken from
#47
Substring: γραμμ AND ερμην
Here it is
http://papyri.info/search?STRING=(γραμμ)%C2%A4(AND+ερμην)&no_caps=on&no_marks=on&target=text&DATE_MODE=LOOSE&DOCS_PER_PAGE=15

The first two hits as well as the display of what you have searched for is like this

Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-23 um 18 03 44

@jcowey
Copy link
Member Author

jcowey commented May 23, 2019

Now of course you can choose various filters to whittle down the numbers of hits according to your perferences.

Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-23 um 18 04 45

@jcowey
Copy link
Member Author

jcowey commented May 23, 2019

My suggestion is that it would help to make clear to people that they have searched through all texts available in the system.
This could be done by putting some sort of text into the "display of what you have searched for".

so instead of

Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-23 um 18 08 10

I could imagine something like

"You have searched in all records: DDB, DCLP, HGV, APIS. These can be filtered by collection."
This would be a fixed text, which would disappear when a filter from collection is applied (and possibly reappear whenever a filter from collection was clicked away).
The display of what you had searched for would, of course, still be in the search box

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants