Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Progress with DCLP problems #261

Open
jcowey opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Progress with DCLP problems #261

jcowey opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@jcowey
Copy link
Member

jcowey commented Jan 14, 2021

I can now create a new DCLP record from advanced create. I have done so and submitted the entry. That means that #259 is sorted. Great. You closed the issue and all is good.

You probably know that one gets an error when trying to open in editor of a DCLP file which has related APIS info. An example that you tried yesterday:
https://papyri.info/dclp/60610
If I open in editor I get:
Bildschirmfoto 2021-01-14 um 11 42 06

You probably know this. Just wanted an issue marker for this one, as it is a blocker for people wanting to work on such records. And I know that some users have wanted to work on records like this.

@jcowey
Copy link
Member Author

jcowey commented Jan 14, 2021

I see that in #217 you found a work around:

"a workaround is to use the editor's "Advanced Create" and paste the identifier e.g. papyri.info/apis/yale.apis.0010620000 into the PN ID field in the "From PN ID" section"

That did indeed function for me.

@ryanfb
Copy link
Member

ryanfb commented Jan 14, 2021

Yes, I believe this should be fixed once a full re-indexing is done with the latest code.

@jcowey
Copy link
Member Author

jcowey commented Jan 14, 2021

OK thanks

@hcayless
Copy link
Member

This appears to work, but the APIS record is not associated with the DCLP metadata and text in the editor, so something to do with the aggregation is broken.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants