You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might be a trivial question, but I am asking this for my own clarity. In Equation 6.5, the variable-importance measure associated with the breakDown analysis is given as $v(j,\underline{x}*)$. In Equation 8.1, the Shapley value is defined as $\varphi(\underline{x}, j)$. Is there a specific reason for the two arguments (j,\underline{x}_) to be flipped in the two equations? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This might be a trivial question, but I am asking this for my own clarity. In Equation 6.5, the variable-importance measure associated with the breakDown analysis is given as $v(j,\underline{x}*)$. In Equation 8.1, the Shapley value is defined as $\varphi(\underline{x}, j)$. Is there a specific reason for the two arguments (j,\underline{x}_) to be flipped in the two equations? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: