suggestion: align terminology "staking token" => "native token"

[turbocrime]

"native token" more accurately identifies the asset as the native token of the chain, used for many things, not just stake

[grod220]

I think "native token" could also apply to tokens like gm/gn as they are native to the penumbra chain. The term native usually distinguishes an asset that originates on the host chain versus one that is ibc'd in.

[turbocrime]

is that useful? a chain can define many tokens but only one is favored as the 'default' for gas fees, delegation, &c

i think also staked tokens (delegation, unbonding), the various position NFTs, &c could also be described as "native" but it also seems clear that "the native token" would refer to the default token

[grod220]

In the interchain, it's common to use the term "native" to distinguish where it originated from. For that reason, we should treat that term as reserved.

[turbocrime]

i think we still do need some kind of terminology refinement

"staking token" could plausibly refer to delegation tokens, for example

"staking" is very literally a thing that hasn't happened to "staking tokens" yet.