Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Validator sorting #524

Open
postpuber opened this issue Dec 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Validator sorting #524

postpuber opened this issue Dec 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@postpuber
Copy link

As I comprehend it, validators are meant to be sorted by voting power. However, in the case of the Uptick network, I have consistently observed exceptions. For instance, the validator with a voting power of 552,733 ranks higher than the one with a voting power of 558,196. Is this an intentional feature or possibly a bug?

https://ping.pub/uptick/staking
@liangping
Copy link
Member

liangping commented Dec 27, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@postpuber thanks for reporting. there's no issue with sorting.

Validators are sorting by delegator_shares fields. in this case, the delegator_share of that validator is higher than others two validators.

@liangping
Copy link
Member

The issue is because delegator_shares is different from 'bonded_tokens'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@liangping @postpuber