Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document custom project names #85

Closed
edublancas opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #103
Closed

document custom project names #85

edublancas opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #103
Assignees

Comments

@edublancas
Copy link
Contributor

i see that the custom project name appears now:

image

but we don't have documentation

@bryannho
Copy link
Contributor

bryannho commented Feb 1, 2024

@edublancas custom project names are mentioned as a paid feature in the pricing overview but not anywhere else.

since it's a paid feature, I don't think it would be appropriate to document in the quickstart guide, but there doesn't seem to be another place to put it.

I also noticed we haven't documented the labels option either. Maybe we could a new page, Identifying project, where we document the custom project name and labels feature? I'll add a note that mentions that custom names is a paid feature

@edublancas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the project name can be documented here: https://docs.cloud.ploomber.io/en/latest/user-guide/custom-domains.html

we can rename the function to: Custom domains/subdomains

changing the project name changes the x portion in x.ploomberapp.io

for the labels, we can create a new "Managing apps" section in the user guide and explain that labels can help you organize and identify your apps

@bryannho
Copy link
Contributor

bryannho commented Feb 2, 2024

@edublancas whoops forgot to mention this issue in the PR #103 , this issue has been addressed so you can close it now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants