Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volume coupling and nearest projection mapping do not integrate well and are untested #162

Open
3 tasks
BenjaminRodenberg opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #163
Open
3 tasks
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@BenjaminRodenberg
Copy link
Member

BenjaminRodenberg commented Sep 28, 2023

The issue precice/tutorials#374 basically originates from a bad integration of volume coupling into the overall code and a lack of testing. I decided to comment out the corresponding code to keep the existing surface coupling features working.

Todos

  • We need some tests that ensure that volume coupling and surface coupling with nearest projection mapping don't conflict
  • We need a proper integration of both features
  • Add channel-transport-reaction as a pure FEniCS case to our tests
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 28, 2023
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg changed the title Volume coupling does not integrate well and is untested Volume coupling and nearest projection mapping do not integrate well and are untested Sep 28, 2023
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Sep 28, 2023
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg modified the milestones: v2.0.0, v2.x.x Feb 12, 2024
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg modified the milestones: v2.x.x, v2.1.0, v2.2.0 Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants