Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use rust-based coverage tools rather than tarpaulin #674

Open
bfjelds opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Use rust-based coverage tools rather than tarpaulin #674

bfjelds opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed keep-alive

Comments

@bfjelds
Copy link
Collaborator

bfjelds commented Oct 26, 2023

Migrate away from tarpaulin as code-coverage in favor or compiler-driven coverage tool built into rust.

More description here

This may lead to more accurate coverage numbers.

@bfjelds
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bfjelds commented Oct 26, 2023

i'm not sure, but using this system might allow for coverage numbers to cover both unit tests and e2e tests:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3166198/with-gcov-is-it-possible-to-merge-to-gcda-files

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Triage needed in Akri Roadmap Nov 13, 2023
@kate-goldenring kate-goldenring added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed keep-alive labels Dec 5, 2023
@kate-goldenring kate-goldenring moved this from Triage needed to Investigating in Akri Roadmap Dec 5, 2023
@kate-goldenring kate-goldenring moved this from Investigating to Backlog in Akri Roadmap Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed keep-alive
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants