From 629aba55dd10aa3e363679489df1bf9f486fa8c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Protobuf Team Bot <protobuf-github-bot@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 15:06:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Improve formatting on the proto_macro rustdoc.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 703265499
---
 rust/proto_macro.rs | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rust/proto_macro.rs b/rust/proto_macro.rs
index 7eb17b9d2969d..18aea19989988 100644
--- a/rust/proto_macro.rs
+++ b/rust/proto_macro.rs
@@ -11,8 +11,11 @@
 /// submessage is being defined as part of the original struct literal.
 /// Introducing an expression using () or {} as the value of a field will
 /// require another call to this macro in order to return a submessage
-/// literal.``` /*
-/// Given the following proto definition
+/// literal.
+///
+/// ```rust,no_run
+/// /*
+/// Given the following proto definition:
 /// message Data {
 ///     int32 number = 1;
 ///     string letters = 2;
@@ -29,7 +32,8 @@
 ///             x + 1
 ///         }
 ///     }
-/// }); ```
+/// });
+/// ```
 #[macro_export]
 macro_rules! proto {
     ($msgtype:ty { $($tt:tt)* }) => {