You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could also possibly give a whirlwind tour of some of the advanced type features (targeting Haskell, Elm, and TypeScript users) with a disclaimer not to worry if the section may be confusing, since it will all be addressed in the upcoming chapters. Another option is to link to language comparisons and cheatsheets purescript/documentation#334.
If you prefer to learn by reading examples, the purescript, purescript-node and purescript-contrib GitHub organizations contain plenty of examples of PureScript code.
The Functional JavaScript section currently reads:
Should probably update this to note
lodash
,ramda
,fp-ts
, andsanctuary
.Readers may ask "what about TypeScript?", so we should explain that TypeScript isn't a "sound" solution for types.
Some more language comparison details here: https://discourse.purescript.org/t/language-highlights/1471
We could also possibly give a whirlwind tour of some of the advanced type features (targeting Haskell, Elm, and TypeScript users) with a disclaimer not to worry if the section may be confusing, since it will all be addressed in the upcoming chapters. Another option is to link to language comparisons and cheatsheets purescript/documentation#334.
A more detailed outline can be found in #193 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: