Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2020. It is now read-only.

Can I suggest this photo editor? #360

Open
photopea opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Can I suggest this photo editor? #360

photopea opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@photopea
Copy link

Hi, can anybody please add www.Photopea.com to the list? It is probably the best web-based image editor.

I am not familiar with Git and forking (I upload my files to GitHub through the web interface).

@kenosando
Copy link

I inspected the site you recommended but I don't see a service worker associated with it, meaning it cannot be used as a PWA offline.

@photopea
Copy link
Author

photopea commented May 30, 2018

Users use Photopea to write text into photos, and they can choose from the database of 4000 fonts. The internet connection is needed to load fonts, which the user selects.

Does it really make sense to require offline functionality in 2018? The total amount of time you spend offline is decreasing, as internet is getting into more and more places. Limiting your list only to offline apps is a huge downside, I think :(

BTW you have Telegram in your list. When the app says "Connect to the internet to send a message", do you really call it offline functionality?

@kenosando
Copy link

If you read the README, it does state a suggested PWA needs to:

  • Be served over HTTPS.
  • Have a manifest with a short_name and name, start_url, and a PNG icon of at least 144×144 pixels.
  • Have a service worker (making sure that the start_url functions offline).

Photopea does have HTTPs, and a manifest with short_name, name, and a PNG icon, but it is missing the service worker.

I am simply stating what the admins of this repository (which is not me) have laid out as requirements and a PWA does require a service worker to be called a PWA.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants