You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When the proposal depends on a ratio between probabilities (BinaryMetropolois, BinaryGibbsMetropolis, CategoricalGibbsMetropolis, Slice, NUTS), we don't need to compute terms that don't depend on the updated variables.
Step samples that explicitly request delta_logp (Metropolis, DEMetropolis) achieve this implicitly via PyTensor rewrites.
I suggest adding a model.dependent_logp(vars) that helps us get the logp we need (the variables of interest + conditional dependent variables)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
As discussed in: https://discourse.pymc.io/t/semantik-description-of-kruschke-diagrams-model-to-graphviz/16142/8 we could be making more use of the conditional partition of the logp graph for partial step samplers.
When the proposal depends on a ratio between probabilities (BinaryMetropolois, BinaryGibbsMetropolis, CategoricalGibbsMetropolis, Slice, NUTS), we don't need to compute terms that don't depend on the updated variables.
Step samples that explicitly request
delta_logp
(Metropolis, DEMetropolis) achieve this implicitly via PyTensor rewrites.I suggest adding a
model.dependent_logp(vars)
that helps us get the logp we need (the variables of interest + conditional dependent variables)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: