Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize CSP model #1038

Open
davide-f opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Generalize CSP model #1038

davide-f opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@davide-f
Copy link
Member

davide-f commented Jun 7, 2024

Describe the feature you'd like to see

Extend the csp modelling to support:

  • multiple CSP technologies at the same time
  • customizability of tower/storage/generation unit

To tackled this, the code shall be revised to support "csp-{technology}" options

@davide-f
Copy link
Member Author

davide-f commented Jun 7, 2024

FYI @pz-max @ekatef @GbotemiB

@ekatef
Copy link
Member

ekatef commented Jun 7, 2024

@davide-f thanks a lot for the issue 🙂

Do you think it makes sense add also the points to consider more advanced modelling features, as we discussed:

  • Land-use availability for CSP should include the slope, which can be implemented using gebco dataset.
  • Some additionally constraints should be applied for CSP model to make sure that its operation is more realistic from thermal engineering perspective.

@davide-f
Copy link
Member Author

davide-f commented Jun 7, 2024

Good point!
The slope issue I think deserve an issue per se, as it applies also to other technologies beyond csp.
For the second point, as well I think it can be a different issue and treated separately.
What do you think?

@ekatef
Copy link
Member

ekatef commented Jun 8, 2024

  • Land-use availability for CSP should include the slope, which can be implemented using gebco dataset.

True, both points have appeared in a discussion around CSP but are actually of different nature. Added as #1039 and #1040 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants