Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

.eval_obj as a call #10

Closed
majidaldo opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12
Closed

.eval_obj as a call #10

majidaldo opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@majidaldo
Copy link

majidaldo commented Jun 23, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Why is .eval_obj an attribute instead of a call?

I know, in English, it implies that processing will occur, but in python semantics, that's an attribute (implying a low overhead op). In python, you'd have something like .eval().
@brandonwillard brandonwillard added the question Further information is requested label Jun 25, 2021
@brandonwillard
Copy link
Member

If anything, it's a misnomer and should be called evaled_obj.

@brandonwillard brandonwillard linked a pull request Jun 25, 2021 that will close this issue
Rename eval obj and fix generators #12
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Rename eval obj and fix generators brandonwillard/etuples
2 participants
@brandonwillard @majidaldo