You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The manuals do not use the same infrastructure as the help files. Specifically, as a GNU project, R uses GNU Texinfo to create the R manuals (https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/), so the source of the manuals are .texi files, e.g. https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/master/doc/manual/R-exts.texi, with different markup from .Rd files. Since .texi is not an R-specific format there is no need to document it fully here, but we should document that manuals use this format. You may need to create a new issue to add this in later in the chapter.
Also people may suggest changes without providing a formal patch.
I'm not sure that proposals for completely new documentation would get very far - that would certainly be unusual, so we shouldn't promote that as a typical way to contribute.
The manuals do not use the same infrastructure as the help files. Specifically, as a GNU project, R uses GNU Texinfo to create the R manuals (https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/), so the source of the manuals are .texi files, e.g. https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/master/doc/manual/R-exts.texi, with different markup from .Rd files. Since .texi is not an R-specific format there is no need to document it fully here, but we should document that manuals use this format. You may need to create a new issue to add this in later in the chapter.
Also people may suggest changes without providing a formal patch.
I'm not sure that proposals for completely new documentation would get very far - that would certainly be unusual, so we shouldn't promote that as a typical way to contribute.
Originally posted by @hturner in #144 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: