You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When plotting a scale with squished oob-handling, I often find it clearer to indicate this with the ≤ and ≥ symbols prepended to the first and last labels respectively. Currently, this requires manually setting breaks and labels.
I think it would be great if this could be an option in the label_number() function, for example with a squished argument taking a logical vector for the lower and upper limit respectively.
I don't think this sort of special behaviour fits into scales. It is pretty easy to wrap label_number() in a function that prepends this to the output if you need it often
When plotting a scale with squished oob-handling, I often find it clearer to indicate this with the ≤ and ≥ symbols prepended to the first and last labels respectively. Currently, this requires manually setting breaks and labels.
Created on 2022-11-05 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
I think it would be great if this could be an option in the
label_number()
function, for example with asquished
argument taking a logical vector for the lower and upper limit respectively.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: