Validation error reported only in stac-browser

[vprivat-ads]

I face a STAC validation error from stac-browser, related to the timestamps extension:

timestamps v1.1.0 Extension
/properties/published must match format "date-time" (format: date-time)
/type must be equal to constant (allowed value: Collection)
/type must be equal to constant (allowed value: Catalog)
must match exactly one schema in "oneOf" (passing schemas: null), for schema #/oneOf 

My STAC item is as follows:
S1A_20241114143038056552_redacted.json

I don't understand the error as the contents look valid to me. I tried to validate the file manually with stac-node-validator and it reports valid contents too, even in strict mode:

$ stac-node-validator ~/S1A_20241114143038056552_redacted.json  --verbose --strict
STAC Node Validator v2.0.0-beta.13

Config
  {
    verbose: true,
    strict: true,
    lint: false,
    format: false,
    schemas: null,
    schemaMap: {},
    custom: null,
    ignoreCerts: false,
    depth: -1,
    config: null,
    loader: [AsyncFunction: loader]
  }

/home/me/S1A_20241114143038056552_redacted.json
  STAC Version: 1.0.0
  Feature: valid
  Extensions
    https://stac-extensions.github.io/timestamps/v1.1.0/schema.json: valid

Summary (1)
  Valid: 1
  Invalid: 0
  Skipped: 0

So I don't understand if I face a bug from stac-browser, stac-node-validator, or simply invalid contents in my data :(

[m-mohr]

Hmm, the published property looks valid to me. So I assume there's some difference between browser JS and Node JS that comes into play here, maybe just different versions of the dependencies (ajv/ajv-formats). Needs further investigation...

[vprivat-ads]

Another weird thing is that for other items where only the date changes, the contents are reported valid. I couldn't characterize the problem yet, I wonder if it only affects dates with milliseconds part starting with a zero or something like that.

[m-mohr]

Another wieird thing is that published is valid and reported as invalid, but datetime/start_datetime/end_datetime are all invalid but not reported as invalid (it should end with a Z, not +00:00).

[m-mohr]

I can reproduce it, but it's really weird. The same string set as datetime and it validates, although it's the same schema and validator. If I change the value slightly in published it also works. I'm a little clueless right now and will investigate further whenever I have a bit more time. Your item seems to be valid at first sight so just ignore the STAC Browser report for now.