From 8e75a9ecc9db0e38e76e09f29e77af3ba0c03dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: skirui-source Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:31:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] minor style fix --- source/examples/xgboost-rf-gpu-cpu-benchmark/notebook.ipynb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/examples/xgboost-rf-gpu-cpu-benchmark/notebook.ipynb b/source/examples/xgboost-rf-gpu-cpu-benchmark/notebook.ipynb index 8511125d..7bc10f0c 100644 --- a/source/examples/xgboost-rf-gpu-cpu-benchmark/notebook.ipynb +++ b/source/examples/xgboost-rf-gpu-cpu-benchmark/notebook.ipynb @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ "\n", "In the notebook demo below, we compare benchmarking results to show how GPU can accelerate HPO tuning jobs relative to CPU.\n", "\n", - "For instance, we find a 48x speedup in wall clock time (0.71 hrs vs 34.6 hrs) for XGBoost and 16x (3.86 hrs vs 63.2 hrs) for RandomForest when comparing between `p3.8xlarge` Tesla V100 GPUs and `c5.24xlarge` CPU EC2 instances on 100 HPO trials on 3 years of the Airline Dataset.\n", + "For instance, we find a 48x speedup in wall clock time (0.71 hrs vs 34.6 hrs) for XGBoost and 16x (3.86 hrs vs 63.2 hrs) for RandomForest when comparing between `p3.8xlarge` Tesla V100 GPUs and `c5.24xlarge` CPU EC2 instances on 100 HPO trials of the 3-year Airline Dataset.\n", "\n" ] },