When using SQL Server as the master database, it seems like having a big number of alerts (either active or inactive - dunno, actually) will impact performance negatively.
I think it's just because the Alerts table does not have even the most basic indexes in place to work effectively, so that should probably be fixed.
When using SQL Server as the master database, it seems like having a big number of alerts (either active or inactive - dunno, actually) will impact performance negatively.
I think it's just because the Alerts table does not have even the most basic indexes in place to work effectively, so that should probably be fixed.