Skip to content

priorityclassname for operator #1500

@lfritz-seweurodrive

Description

@lfritz-seweurodrive

According to the values.yaml, the operator does currently not have a priorityclassname.
It should have one - so that when resources need to be pre-emptied, the operator still stays alive due to higher priority than lower value resources, e.g.

priorityClassName: "operator"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions