Refactor maxBytes

[tzdybal]

i feel like `maxBytes` is confusing and may be we should get rid of it altogether and go with the assumption that:
* sequencer will make fast batches of smaller sizes such that the batch will likely never exceed the execution client's block gas limits. 

 i am recommending this because, `maxBytes` is kind of useless. what do you think?

Originally posted by @gupadhyaya in rollkit/rollkit#1947 (review)

Further discussion in the PR comments: rollkit/rollkit#1947 (comment)

---

maxBytes handling is a bit confusing in current version of execution API. There are many issues there.

1. maxBytes is not always the best way to set the limits - maxGas could also be used.
2. Probably we can return the value in a cleaner way.

More context for maxBytes / maxGas

1. maxBytes or maxGas is logically defined in execution client. It's strictly related to limits configured in given execution environment.
2. Some execution VMs might put restrictions on gas, and other on size (bytes).
3. At the same time, limit has to be communicated to sequencer so the batches consists of transactions fitting single block.
4. Sequencer might not be able to estimate the gas required for each transaction. But advanced implementations might want to estimate or even calculate actual gas usage.