Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling higher taxonomic names #19

Open
hannahlowens opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Handling higher taxonomic names #19

hannahlowens opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@hannahlowens
Copy link
Collaborator

hannahlowens commented Mar 2, 2022

Also from @damianooldoni:
"why don't you allow the user to specify the rank itself by adding an argument rank to the function? In this way you make your function much more useful... you can add a default value ("species") to this new argument. This is also important as it can be applied for a multi-species search! You can just pass a vector of species to argument taxon or simply the parent name, e.g. Gadus to get all occurrences of Gadus spp.

I would also suggest to add (at least) a kingdom argument to avoid hemihomony. An alternative would be to allow the user to select which taxon he/she means if GBIF returns multiple taxa instead of choosing the first key.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant