You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have two OS1's connected to an arm64-based controller running Foxy. One is a 64 channel and the other is a 32 channel. When I launch the node for the 64 channel, it works and I get a point cloud. However, when I launch the 32 channel, I get a seg fault in the node.
I added backwards_ros to the node to get the stack trace and I've attached it. I've also attached the parameter files for both nodes.
I think to unblock you you can change this line in the params: os1_proc_mask: IMG|PCL|IMU|SCAN
From the trace you can see it's coming from the scan processor [ouster_driver-1] #0 | Source "/workspace/src/ouster_driver/include/ros2_ouster/processors/scan_processor.hpp", line 80, in toMsg
Try setting this parameter to the following if you don't need the SCAN functionality. os1_proc_mask: IMG|PCL|IMU
See if that helps and please report back. Then we can focus on how to fix the segfault for SCAN.
We tried removing the SCAN functionality and the node doesn't crash anymore, however, we don't get a point cloud. If we connect to the LiDAR with a laptop and Ouster Studio we can see a point cloud there. We'll try sniffing the packets with Wireshark and see what the LiDAR is sending out when the node is up.
Hi there,
I have two OS1's connected to an arm64-based controller running Foxy. One is a 64 channel and the other is a 32 channel. When I launch the node for the 64 channel, it works and I get a point cloud. However, when I launch the 32 channel, I get a seg fault in the node.
I added backwards_ros to the node to get the stack trace and I've attached it. I've also attached the parameter files for both nodes.
ouster-segfault-stacktrace.txt
os1_ch64_params.txt
ouster-curl-data.txt
os1_ch32_params.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: