Move project to new repo?

[wmonecke]

I see that @rt2zz isn't active anymore. I have tried reaching out through multiple platforms without any response. Nonetheless, I think we are all grateful for his contributions and owe Zack a big thank you.

However, a lot of people are using this package and there are 70+ PRs open and countless issues that are quite critical.

I propose we move this package to a new "official" repo where all these PRs can be merged.

I am willing to create the repo and start merging stuff.

Is this something that you guys are interested in? Otherwise, I will just fork and do my stuff but the community wouldn't benefit as a whole.

[ZaidTryngo]

Please 🙏 Do this

[yeupanhmaj]

agree with you

[mxsxs2]

If that happens it could be a good idea to integrate encryption to the package too:
https://github.com/maxdeviant/redux-persist-transform-encrypt

[andriemc]

I see that @rt2zz isn't active anymore. I have tried reaching out through multiple platforms without any response. Nonetheless, I think we are all grateful for his contributions and owe Zack a big thank you.

However, a lot of people are using this package and there are 70+ PRs open and countless issues that are quite critical.

I propose we move this package to a new "official" repo where all these PRs can be merged.

I am willing to create the repo and start merging stuff.

Is this something that you guys are interested in? Otherwise, I will just fork and do my stuff but the community wouldn't benefit as a whole.

This or a fork would be appreciated.

[wmonecke]

@ckalika You mentioned you were taking over the repo - this is me trying one last time to see if we can get PRs merged. Would you be open to me joining as a maintainer? We could chat about this if you like.

[wmonecke]

I encourage anyone here to try https://github.com/zewish/redux-remember before jumping ship to another solution.

[PymZoR]

I encourage anyone here to try https://github.com/zewish/redux-remember before jumping ship to another solution.

Is there any pros/con or any kind of comparison between those two projects (other than persist being unmaintained) ?

[wmonecke]

@PymZoR Not really, redux-persist has a HOC for when the state is being rehydrated that redux-remember does not have (but you can easily write).

IMO redux-remember is minimal and that makes it quite attractive.

[aqeelat]

@wmonecke I'll try to reach out to @ckalika on linkedin to bring his attention to this issue.

[ckalika]

Thanks @aqeelat for the ping, separately.

Hi guys.

I've not been active on this for a long while due to personal and professional responsibilities getting in the way, and that's entirely my bad.

I need to spend a bit of time cleaning things up here, but I agree with a lot of what you guys are saying.

If you guys can bear with me for a bit, I'll try to prioritise this more and see what we can get closed in the next little while.

[wmonecke]

@ckalika Hey there!

Would you be open to adding another repo maintainer to the project? Having only one active maintainer in such a big repo could mean leaving PRs open for quite some time.

[clintonmedbery]

I agree with @wmonecke. I would create some issues and let whomever shows some initiative get a maintainer role.

[aqeelat]

I would suggest we first create a transparent CI/CD process requiring at least 2 devs to approve PRs, and prevent any individual maintainer from uploading release archives manually.Perhaps create multiple micro releases where after each PR is merged, a new release is created.This way, the trust barrier is significantly lower.Sent from my iPhoneOn May 10, 2024, at 6:13 AM, Clinton Medbery ***@***.***> wrote: I agree with @wmonecke. I would create some issues and let whomever shows some initiative get a maintainer role. —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[gethari]

Is this project dead ?