What about global_asm?

[comex]

The only mention of global_asm! in the RFC is a note under "future possibilities" that global_asm! could be extended to support imm and sym constraints.

That would be nice, but what about the current form of global_asm!? Is the RFC proposing to stabilize it? It probably should be stabilized along with the new asm!, but the RFC doesn't explicitly say so.

[gnzlbg]

The RFC does not mention anything about global_asm!, so AFAICT, it is not proposing to do anything about it.

It probably should be stabilized along with the new asm!,

Why?

[Amanieu]

This is actually mentioned in the project group charter, which states that global_asm! is within the scope of the project group, but it is left for the future since it is not required for an inline assembly MVP.