Rename and document ONLY_HOSTS in bootstrap#145324
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Aug 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
|
Collaborator
|
This PR changes how GCC is built. Consider updating src/bootstrap/download-ci-gcc-stamp. This PR changes how LLVM is built. Consider updating src/bootstrap/download-ci-llvm-stamp. |
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
Member
jieyouxu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm yeah, the --{host,target} situation feels rather confusing... Thanks
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup=never (I feel like this will conflict with other bootstrap PRs) |
Collaborator
Member
|
Hm but maybe let's see |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
…ouxu Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap Everytime I examined the `ONLY_HOSTS` flag of bootstrap steps, I was utterly confused. Why is it called ONLY_HOSTS? How does the fact that it is skipped if `--target` is passed, but `--host` is not (which was not accurate) help me? The reality of the flag is that if it is true, the targets for which the given Step will be built is determined based on the `--host` flag, while if it is false, it is determined based on the `--target` flag, that's pretty much it. The previous comment was just a (not very helpful and not even accurate) corollary of that. I clarified the comment, and also renamed the flag to `IS_HOST` (happy to brainstorm better names, but the doc. comment change is IMO the main improvement). r? `@jieyouxu`
Member
|
I wonder if this is the one which failed in #145363 ? |
Member
Author
|
Unlikely, this only renamed a const item. |
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #145366) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #122661 (Change the desugaring of `assert!` for better error output) - #142372 (Improve `--remap-path-prefix` documentation) - #143075 (compiler: Allow `extern "interrupt" fn() -> !`) - #145005 (strip prefix of temporary file names when it exceeds filesystem name length limit) - #145065 (resolve: Introduce `RibKind::Block`) - #145120 (llvm: Accept new LLVM lifetime format) - #145189 (Weekly `cargo update`) - #145261 (Improve tracing in bootstrap) - #145266 (Reduce some queries around associated items) - #145299 (doc test: fix mpsc.rs try_send doc test) - #145331 (Make std use the edition 2024 prelude) - #145353 (bootstrap: Fix jemalloc 64K page support for aarch64 tools) - #145361 (Suppress wrapper suggestion when expected and actual ty are the same adt and the variant is unresolved) Failed merges: - #145324 (Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap) - #145372 (resolve: Miscellaneous cleanups) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #122661 (Change the desugaring of `assert!` for better error output) - #142372 (Improve `--remap-path-prefix` documentation) - #143075 (compiler: Allow `extern "interrupt" fn() -> !`) - #145005 (strip prefix of temporary file names when it exceeds filesystem name length limit) - #145065 (resolve: Introduce `RibKind::Block`) - #145120 (llvm: Accept new LLVM lifetime format) - #145189 (Weekly `cargo update`) - #145261 (Improve tracing in bootstrap) - #145266 (Reduce some queries around associated items) - #145299 (doc test: fix mpsc.rs try_send doc test) - #145331 (Make std use the edition 2024 prelude) - #145353 (bootstrap: Fix jemalloc 64K page support for aarch64 tools) - #145361 (Suppress wrapper suggestion when expected and actual ty are the same adt and the variant is unresolved) Failed merges: - #145324 (Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap) - #145372 (resolve: Miscellaneous cleanups) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
a43def7 to
e08c755
Compare
Member
Author
|
@bors r=jieyouxu Rebased. |
Collaborator
Kobzol
added a commit
to Kobzol/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
…ouxu Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap Everytime I examined the `ONLY_HOSTS` flag of bootstrap steps, I was utterly confused. Why is it called ONLY_HOSTS? How does the fact that it is skipped if `--target` is passed, but `--host` is not (which was not accurate) help me? The reality of the flag is that if it is true, the targets for which the given Step will be built is determined based on the `--host` flag, while if it is false, it is determined based on the `--target` flag, that's pretty much it. The previous comment was just a (not very helpful and not even accurate) corollary of that. I clarified the comment, and also renamed the flag to `IS_HOST` (happy to brainstorm better names, but the doc. comment change is IMO the main improvement). r? `@jieyouxu`
This was referenced Aug 14, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #137872 (Include whitespace in "remove |" suggestion and make it hidden) - #144631 (Fix test intrinsic-raw_eq-const-bad for big-endian) - #145233 (cfg_select: Support unbraced expressions) - #145261 (Improve tracing in bootstrap) - #145324 (Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap) - #145353 (bootstrap: Fix jemalloc 64K page support for aarch64 tools) - #145379 (bootstrap: Support passing `--timings` to cargo) - #145397 (Rust documentation, use `rustc-dev-guide` :3) - #145398 (Use `default_field_values` in `Resolver`) - #145401 (cleanup: Remove useless `[T].iter().last()`) - #145403 (Adjust error message grammar to be less awkward) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2025
Rollup merge of #145324 - Kobzol:bootstrap-host-only, r=jieyouxu Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap Everytime I examined the `ONLY_HOSTS` flag of bootstrap steps, I was utterly confused. Why is it called ONLY_HOSTS? How does the fact that it is skipped if `--target` is passed, but `--host` is not (which was not accurate) help me? The reality of the flag is that if it is true, the targets for which the given Step will be built is determined based on the `--host` flag, while if it is false, it is determined based on the `--target` flag, that's pretty much it. The previous comment was just a (not very helpful and not even accurate) corollary of that. I clarified the comment, and also renamed the flag to `IS_HOST` (happy to brainstorm better names, but the doc. comment change is IMO the main improvement). r? ``@jieyouxu``
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#137872 (Include whitespace in "remove |" suggestion and make it hidden) - rust-lang/rust#144631 (Fix test intrinsic-raw_eq-const-bad for big-endian) - rust-lang/rust#145233 (cfg_select: Support unbraced expressions) - rust-lang/rust#145261 (Improve tracing in bootstrap) - rust-lang/rust#145324 (Rename and document `ONLY_HOSTS` in bootstrap) - rust-lang/rust#145353 (bootstrap: Fix jemalloc 64K page support for aarch64 tools) - rust-lang/rust#145379 (bootstrap: Support passing `--timings` to cargo) - rust-lang/rust#145397 (Rust documentation, use `rustc-dev-guide` :3) - rust-lang/rust#145398 (Use `default_field_values` in `Resolver`) - rust-lang/rust#145401 (cleanup: Remove useless `[T].iter().last()`) - rust-lang/rust#145403 (Adjust error message grammar to be less awkward) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Everytime I examined the
ONLY_HOSTSflag of bootstrap steps, I was utterly confused. Why is it called ONLY_HOSTS? How does the fact that it is skipped if--targetis passed, but--hostis not (which was not accurate) help me?The reality of the flag is that if it is true, the targets for which the given Step will be built is determined based on the
--hostflag, while if it is false, it is determined based on the--targetflag, that's pretty much it. The previous comment was just a (not very helpful and not even accurate) corollary of that.I clarified the comment, and also renamed the flag to
IS_HOST(happy to brainstorm better names, but the doc. comment change is IMO the main improvement).r? @jieyouxu