Improve parsing of rustc artifacts#1755
Merged
Kobzol merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Nov 26, 2023
Merged
Conversation
The format of the artifacts was changed in a recent rustc PR, which broke rustc-perf's CI.
Mark-Simulacrum
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The format of the artifacts was changed in a recent rustc PR, which broke rustc-perf's CI, because we weren't correctly filtering the artifacts.
Since the
eprintlnprofiler is mostly used for local profiling, I think that it's okay to only support the latest version of rustc, and not keep compatibility with previous versions. For older rustc versions, theeprintlnoutput will just contain a few additional lines.This PR should fix rustc-perf's CI, which started failing on master recently because of the rustc change.