Only one Addresses per time

[bitcoinlover888]

I need generate many prefixes at same time, could it generate many prefix at same time on windows, It generate one per time, I need for exemple put 20 prefixes and when the first is found write and keep searching other, but the software must check all addresses for every key generate, could someone help me?

[pootsniff]

I asked the same question but haven't yet found a way to search in parallel.

-k allows for searching of multiple prefixes, but as you noted you're looking at the same time running with the k parameter and a list of prefixes as if you ran them all individually

[number9387]

Are you sure that's what's happening? (one address at a time) or is the estimated time to find the address only showing one at a time? I get that its programmed to show the time until the most likely address in the list, but to outright look for only one at a time seems ridiculous.

[bitcoinlover888]

I developed a software that look for 2 million addresses in a list at same time. On Nov 15, 2017 19:17, "number9387" <[email protected]> wrote: Are you sure that's what's happening? (one address at a time) or is the estimated time to find the address only showing one at a time? I get that its programmed to show the time until the most likely address in the list, but to outright look for only one at a time seems ridiculous. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#101 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ae51nclSm6Fd5BrO69Nn3JUeEGHTnTVCks5s21T7gaJpZM4PpYdW> .

[number9387]

Are you offering this software or are you using that as proof you know what you're talking about with regards to this issue? I would think an explicit analysis of the code would be required to determine whether it is checking all addresses or not at all times.

[bitcoinlover888]

I am selling it for 0.1 BTC I already sold for 5 people and 4 of them have find collisions include me, no that one is not used as proof and if I show you the code there is no reason to sell because u will have it, If you want it pay 0.1, I am serious considering not sell this anymore because I already made 70 BTC in 5 months.

…

On Nov 15, 2017 19:42, "number9387" ***@***.***> wrote: Are you offering this software or are you using that as proof you know what you're talking about with regards to this issue? I would think an explicit analysis of the code would be required to determine whether it is checking all addresses or not at all times. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#101 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ae51nWyRAu2UzBdHMGgpXqtMW8IBbypZks5s21rZgaJpZM4PpYdW> .

[number9387]

Oh, no no no, I wasn't asking for your software. I wouldn't mind it, but that wasn't what I was doing. I was merely asking what the context of your response was. Sounds great, but I'd first have to have .1 bitcoin to be able to purchase it, unfortunately. 70 btc would definitely be more than enough to take care of all my debts! And save my house, lol.

[bitcoinlover888]

Ok

…

On Nov 15, 2017 7:55 PM, "number9387" ***@***.***> wrote: Oh, no no no, I wasn't asking for your software. I wouldn't mind it, but that wasn't what I was doing. I was merely asking what the context of your response was. Sounds great, but I'd first have to *have* .1 bitcoin to be able to purchase it, unfortunately. 70 btc would definitely be more than enough to take care of all my debts! And save my house, lol. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#101 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ae51nZAbo0l7HdxuV5OWiX0Ys5Rjf_EMks5s2121gaJpZM4PpYdW> .

[DNS]

You can open multiple Command Prompt window and run it.