Skip to content

chore(ci): canonical fleet-standard workflows - #37

Closed
ywatanabe1989 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
chore/standardize-workflows
Closed

chore(ci): canonical fleet-standard workflows#37
ywatanabe1989 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
chore/standardize-workflows

Conversation

@ywatanabe1989

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fleet-wide standardization: canonical ci.yml (self-hosted spartan-cpu + uv) + release.yml (publish-if-pip) + CLA allowlist (+LLEmacs); legacy workflows removed; validated on scitex-io.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please sign the SciTeX CLA before your contribution can be merged.
Comment I have read and agree to the SciTeX CLA. to sign.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@ywatanabe1989

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing as superseded — fleet PR/Issue backlog sweep, 2026-08-11.

What this PR attempted: install the then-canonical fleet-standard workflow set.

Why it is being closed: it belonged to a fleet-wide sweep opened on 2026-06-19 (52 days ago) that was never merged in this repo. That subject has since been reworked by later generations of the same change — on the repos sampled, today's default branch already carries the intended shape, or has moved to the org-level reusable workflow entirely. The premise this PR was written against no longer describes this repo.

Nothing is deleted. Branch chore/standardize-workflows still holds every commit, and this PR can be reopened. An old PR assumes a codebase that has since moved, so re-doing this against today's default branch is faster and safer than rebasing a 52-day-old sweep.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants