You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not really an issue, more of a recommendation. The 240x240 display, while fine from further away, is pretty obviously low resolution up-close. This makes the final "product" look cheap in my opinion.
There's a number of similarly priced, similarly sized, but 125% higher resolution displays. Here's a good example. 1.32" (compared to the 1.28" of the GC9A01), uses a very similar controller, and comes with a ZIF "lego" connector, making it easier to mount.
I understand that as of this moment there are still memory issues with the selected MCU, but those can be overcome by using a beefier boy in its place (a nice upgrade would be the already noted ESP32-S3, with some PSRAM).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not really an issue, more of a recommendation. The 240x240 display, while fine from further away, is pretty obviously low resolution up-close. This makes the final "product" look cheap in my opinion.
There's a number of similarly priced, similarly sized, but 125% higher resolution displays. Here's a good example. 1.32" (compared to the 1.28" of the GC9A01), uses a very similar controller, and comes with a ZIF "lego" connector, making it easier to mount.
I understand that as of this moment there are still memory issues with the selected MCU, but those can be overcome by using a beefier boy in its place (a nice upgrade would be the already noted ESP32-S3, with some PSRAM).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: