Geo component and concept role name

[achronis]

Hi

(in case it is not fixed already)
It is about an inconsistency between public draft Technical Notes and a sample here in sdmx-ml concerning the concept role id.
(relates to #9 )

The Technical Notes line 1172 notes that the role is GEO_FEATURE_SET:

1171 Any Component used for representing a Geographical Feature Set, i.e., used to
1172 describe geographical characteristics, must have a “GEO_FEATURE_SET” role. Its
1173 Representation would be of textType="GeospatialInformation".

But in the sdmx-ml sample samples/Geospatial/geospatial_geocomponents.xml#L58 it has role GEO.

[dosse]

Hi @DrJMunozMx, @jgager could you please help answering this question?

[dosse]

@dbarr99 Currently, the global SDMX Concept Scheme for Concept Roles only has a concept for GEO, but none for the new role GEO_FEATURE_SET as defined in SDMX 3.0 in the SDMX Technical Notes, line 1172:

1171 Any Component used for representing a Geographical Feature Set, i.e., used to
1172 describe geographical characteristics, must have a “GEO_FEATURE_SET” role. Its
1173 Representation would be of textType="GeospatialInformation".

Are you planning to add this role? We can then update the samples/Geospatial/geospatial_geocomponents.xml.

[hoehrmann]

I ended up here because https://sdmx.org/wp-content/uploads/SDMX_3-0-0_SECTION_2_FINAL-1_0.pdf has a ComponentRoleType with geo_feature_set which I could not find anywhere but here.

[DrJMunozMx]

Yes, the roles list must be updated in the COG. By the moment we have the example using the GEO role as a temporary way to represent it.