Skip to content

Fix the 'open source' / Pro / licensing framing (ShakaPerf is BSL, RSC is paid Pro) #6

Description

@sashakhar1

The page calls all four projects / ShakaStack "open source," and leads its headline features on a paid tier. Both are inaccurate or undisclosed, and buyers (Rails eng, eng manager, CTO, OSS-cautious staff) all flagged it.

a) ShakaPerf is source-available (BSL 1.1), not open source. Its own repo: license badge BSL 1.1, LICENSE = Business Source License 1.1 (converts to Apache 2.0 after 3y). Locations calling it open source: Hero.astro:15, Footer.astro:52, Layout.astro:11, Stack.astro:16, shaka.ts:15, README.md.

b) RSC / streaming SSR / selective hydration require React on Rails Pro (paid) - stated only once in a buried benefit; no free-vs-Pro boundary, no pricing.

Fix: correct the umbrella (e.g. "four ShakaCode projects - open source, plus ShakaPerf source-available") and add a short "free vs Pro" line near the comparison matrix with a pricing/Pro link.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions