Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate from gp2 to gp3 ebs volumes #880

Closed
kaladinlight opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #882
Closed

Migrate from gp2 to gp3 ebs volumes #880

kaladinlight opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #882
Assignees

Comments

@kaladinlight
Copy link
Collaborator

Overview

Migrating to gp3 ebs volumes will result in a cost saving of at least 5% across the board. We will also be able to play around with custom IOPS/throughput configuration for some of our more problematic chains (bsc and polygon) to see if this improves performance.

References and additional details

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/migrating-amazon-eks-clusters-from-gp2-to-gp3-ebs-volumes/
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/simplifying-amazon-ebs-volume-migration-and-modification-using-the-ebs-csi-driver/
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/blob/master/docs/modify-volume.md

Acceptance Criteria

  • Update all volumes to gp3
  • Add config to support custom IOPS/throughput
  • Annotate PVCs accodingly if config is provided
  • Custom config for polygon and bsc

Need By Date

No response

Screenshots/Mockups

No response

Estimated effort

No response

@kaladinlight kaladinlight self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
@kaladinlight kaladinlight moved this from To schedule to In progress in ShapeShift Dashboard Nov 6, 2023
@kaladinlight kaladinlight linked a pull request Nov 10, 2023 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in ShapeShift Dashboard Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant