You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This document contains performance benchmarks and security scan results for SILENTCHAIN AI across different AI models, providers, and target applications.
Benchmark Results
Test 1: Ollama DeepSeek-V3.1 on ASP.NET TestInvicti
Product
SILENTCHAIN AI Professional v1.1.0
AI Provider
Ollama
Model
deepseek-v3.1:671b-cloud
Target(s)
aspnet.testinvicti.com
Performance
Metric
Value
Total Scan Time
19.0 minutes
AI Requests
137
Avg Time/Request
8.32s
Total Tokens
138,742
Avg Tokens/Request
1,012
Findings
Severity
Count
🔴 High
16
🟠 Medium
37
🟡 Low
63
🔵 Info
35
Total
151
Verified (Phase 2)
20
Scan Coverage
Metric
Value
URLs Processed
78
URLs Analyzed
42
Skipped (Dup)
50
Errors
22
Test 2: Ollama gpt-oss:120b on Angular TestInvicti
Product
SILENTCHAIN AI Professional v1.3.21
AI Provider
Ollama
Model
gpt-oss:120b-cloud
Target(s)
angular.testinvicti.com
Performance
Metric
Value
Total Scan Time
2h 6m
AI Requests
299
Avg Time/Request
25.33s
Total Tokens
407,227
Avg Tokens/Request
1,361
Findings
Severity
Count
🔴 High
10
🟠 Medium
80
🟡 Low
170
🔵 Info
39
Total
299
Verified (Phase 2)
12
Scan Coverage
Metric
Value
URLs Processed
98
URLs Analyzed
81
Skipped (Dup)
56
Skipped (Low Conf)
0
Errors
0
Phase 2 Telemetry
Metric
Value
Phase 2 Attempts
15
Heuristic Matches
204
AI Verification Calls
204
AI Confirmed
4
AI Rejected
147
AI Response Parse Fails
0
Benchmark History
More benchmarks will be added here as additional models, providers, and target applications are tested.
Planned Tests
OpenAI GPT-4 on aspnet.testinvicti.com
Claude 3.5 Sonnet on aspnet.testinvicti.com
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro on aspnet.testinvicti.com
Ollama Llama 3.1 on various targets
Ollama Qwen 2.5 Coder on various targets
Comparative analysis across OWASP Juice Shop
Performance testing on large-scale applications
Methodology
Test Environment
Burp Suite: Professional Edition
SILENTCHAIN: Professional v1.1.0
Network: Standard broadband connection
Hardware: (To be documented per test)
Test Targets
aspnet.testinvicti.com: ASP.NET vulnerable application for security testing
More targets will be added in future benchmarks
Metrics Explained
Performance Metrics
Total Scan Time: Wall-clock time from first request to last finding
AI Requests: Number of API calls made to the AI provider
Avg Time/Request: Average response time per AI analysis
Total Tokens: Combined input + output tokens used
Avg Tokens/Request: Average token consumption per request
Finding Metrics
High Severity: Critical vulnerabilities requiring immediate attention
Medium Severity: Important security issues with moderate risk
Low Severity: Minor vulnerabilities or security weaknesses
Info: Informational findings and security notes
Verified (Phase 2): Findings confirmed through active exploitation (Professional only)
Coverage Metrics
URLs Processed: Total unique URLs encountered
URLs Analyzed: URLs that underwent AI analysis
Skipped (Dup): Duplicate URLs not re-analyzed
Errors: Requests that failed analysis
Contributing Benchmarks
If you'd like to contribute benchmark results:
Run SILENTCHAIN on a public vulnerable application (DVWA, Juice Shop, WebGoat, etc.)
Document your test environment:
SILENTCHAIN version
AI provider and model
Target application
Hardware specs (CPU, RAM)
Network conditions
Export benchmark report from SILENTCHAIN
Submit via GitHub Issue or Pull Request
Notes
All benchmarks are performed on publicly accessible test applications designed for security testing
Results may vary based on:
AI model version and capabilities
Network latency
Hardware resources
Target application complexity
Burp Suite configuration
For Ollama benchmarks: Local hardware significantly impacts performance
For Cloud AI benchmarks: Network latency and API rate limits affect results