Skip to content

Extract protobuf spec into own repository #36

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sillydan1 opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Extract protobuf spec into own repository #36

sillydan1 opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sillydan1
Copy link
Owner

It's a bit too annoying with the copy-paste mess... Having the lsp.proto in a seperate repository would make it easier to synchronize versions.

Maybe also consider if there are someone who've made a protobuf package manager - this could also be your time to shine 🌞

Nevermind, this buffrs looks like the way to go (once they have the buffrs registry up and running)

@sillydan1 sillydan1 converted this from a draft issue Feb 5, 2024
@sillydan1 sillydan1 self-assigned this Feb 5, 2024
@sillydan1 sillydan1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 5, 2024
@sillydan1
Copy link
Owner Author

I can't keep waiting for buffrs central repository to be done. I should just host the docker container on the gtz.dk servers for now.

@sillydan1
Copy link
Owner Author

sillydan1 commented Feb 13, 2024

It seems the registry container is still very much a work in progress. We might have to do something custom and temporary in the meanwhile.

Considerations:

  • Simply host a nexus3 instance and publish a package there
  • Git submodules 😠
  • Just live with manually copying the file in plugins (gets crazy FAST)
  • Write your own repo manager (such a huge effin' sidequest..., also this)

@sillydan1
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing with the creation of https://github.com/sillydan1/graphedit-protobuf

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Graphedit Feb 18, 2024
@mara-schulke
Copy link

Hi @sillydan1,

we pivoted our efforts in buffrs towards supporting OCI registries over a custom registry.

See helsing-ai/buffrs#229 for tracking

@sillydan1
Copy link
Owner Author

Hi @mara-schulke!

That looks very interesting! I will make sure to keep an eye out for that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants