Dependencies?

[gwillen]

It would be helpful if there were some guidance provided on the dependencies of this project and how to obtain them.

RXTXcomm.jar seems easy enough to come by, but as far as I can tell the com.ae5pl.* classes are only available directly by special request from ae5pl, which makes it sort of annoying to build this software (especially since the special-request process seems to be in place because of the igate functionality of javAPRSsrvr, which I don't think javAX25 even necessarily depends on.)

Can you provide any clarification about how this is supposed to work?

Thanks,
Glenn Willen, KI6CPV

[gwillen]

An update: I got the following from Pete Loveall, AE5PL:

"Are you talking about Sivan's sound card interface? If so, take a look at the root .java files. The file with a reference to com.ae5pl.nsutil is not needed and can safely be removed. He originally wrote the interface to work as a serial interface for javAPRSSrvr and that .java file defines the interface class. His code works as standalone as well so that file can be removed."

Perhaps this could be documented. :-)

[gwillen]

... unfortunately it seems like this might not be true, because you use nsVector, which looks like it's his class, all over the place.

[gwillen]

Seems like nsVector is just Vector<Object>, and the other two nsFoo are just Foo? I'm not sure why those classes exist, now... I have it building at least.

EDIT: Yeah, it's working after a bunch of search-and-replace.

[sivantoledo]

right, the code can be used stand alone. I'll add this to the
documentation. Thanks, Sivan

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:41 AM, gwillen [email protected] wrote:

An update: I got the following from Pete Loveall, AE5PL:

"Are you talking about Sivan's sound card interface? If so, take a look at
the root .java files. The file with a reference to com.ae5pl.nsutil is not
needed and can safely be removed. He originally wrote the interface to work
as a serial interface for javAPRSSrvr and that .java file defines the
interface class. His code works as standalone as well so that file can be
removed."

Perhaps this could be documented. :-)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

[sivantoledo]

I am not sure. This is a bit strange. I'll take a look.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:06 AM, gwillen [email protected] wrote:

Seems like nsVector is just Vector, and the other two nsFoo are just Foo?
I'm not sure why those classes exist, now... I have it building at least.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).