We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The "Deep dive on GD and optimality" video just popped up on my youtube feed and I think the definition of L-smoothness contains a typo. Instead of
|| \nabla \fx - \nabla f(\tilde{\xv}) || \le L ||\fx - f(\tilde{\xv}) || \quad \text{ for all } \xv, \tilde{\xv}
I think it should be
|| \nabla \fx - \nabla f(\tilde{\xv}) || \le L ||\xv - \tilde{\xv} || \quad \text{ for all } \xv, \tilde{\xv}
lecture_optimization/slides/04-multivariate-first-order/slides-multivar-first-order-3-gd-deepdive-optimality.tex
Line 49 in 67a1b17
(source e.g. here https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~ryantibs/convexopt-F13/scribes/lec6.pdf)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The "Deep dive on GD and optimality" video just popped up on my youtube feed and I think the definition of L-smoothness contains a typo. Instead of
|| \nabla \fx - \nabla f(\tilde{\xv}) || \le L ||\fx - f(\tilde{\xv}) || \quad \text{ for all } \xv, \tilde{\xv}
I think it should be
|| \nabla \fx - \nabla f(\tilde{\xv}) || \le L ||\xv - \tilde{\xv} || \quad \text{ for all } \xv, \tilde{\xv}
lecture_optimization/slides/04-multivariate-first-order/slides-multivar-first-order-3-gd-deepdive-optimality.tex
Line 49 in 67a1b17
(source e.g. here https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~ryantibs/convexopt-F13/scribes/lec6.pdf)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: