You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Training with batch size = 1 cost over 30GB VRAM, which is different in paper (batch size = 4 cost 27.9GB VRAM).
My ckpt file (saved in training) is 13.7 GB, which is different in provided ckpt (summer2winter.ckpt = 6.7 GB)
Would you explain how to reproduce the original works?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yryun
changed the title
Too much VRAM and ckpt file compared to example provided
Too much VRAM cost and ckpt file volume compared to the paper
Mar 1, 2024
Thanks for great work!
I followed the example provided with cfill dataset.
-> https://github.com/sled-group/CycleNet/blob/main/docs/train.md
I found 2 differences with the original works.
Training with batch size = 1 cost over 30GB VRAM, which is different in paper (batch size = 4 cost 27.9GB VRAM).
My ckpt file (saved in training) is 13.7 GB, which is different in provided ckpt (summer2winter.ckpt = 6.7 GB)
Would you explain how to reproduce the original works?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: