You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello all, I've recently adding experimental support for webmention on my website, and I've only received one so far, from brid.gy. However, the source redirects to a Mastodon comment that is apparently not the one that actually links to a page on my website, but a comment in reply to it.
Interesting! You're right, that's not ideal, but it does happen occasionally. It's surprisingly complicated to navigate all the different threads and paths through them to determine exactly the right set of webmention targets for a given reply or other interaction. Bridgy is pretty good at it at this point, but when things get complicated, it defaults to being "promiscuous," ie it errs on the side of sending too many webmentions, rather than too few and possibly missing one.
In this case, since threads are common on Mastodon etc, and this was from the same author as the original post that linked to you, Bridgy interprets it as a follow-up that should probably be included with the original. To that end, it includes a u-in-reply-to link to the original post, and only a u-mention-of link to your web page.
Still complicated, I know. Sorry for the confusion!
No problem. The weird thing is that I'm not seeing a webmention for the original comment, although that might be because I was still working on the implementation on my side when the comment was written so I missed it. We can close this issue for me, unless you'd prefer to keep it open for reference.
Hello all, I've recently adding experimental support for webmention on my website, and I've only received one so far, from brid.gy. However, the
source
redirects to a Mastodon comment that is apparently not the one that actually links to a page on my website, but a comment in reply to it.target
: https://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-2/source
: https://brid.gy/comment/mastodon/@[email protected]/113432923029140253/113432947618109928Is this expected?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: