Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Received a brid.gy webmention from a Mastodon comment that was in reply to the one that actually linked to my post #1838

Open
Oblomov opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Oblomov
Copy link

Oblomov commented Nov 9, 2024

Hello all, I've recently adding experimental support for webmention on my website, and I've only received one so far, from brid.gy. However, the source redirects to a Mastodon comment that is apparently not the one that actually links to a page on my website, but a comment in reply to it.

target: https://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-2/

source: https://brid.gy/comment/mastodon/@[email protected]/113432923029140253/113432947618109928

Is this expected?

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner

snarfed commented Nov 9, 2024

Interesting! You're right, that's not ideal, but it does happen occasionally. It's surprisingly complicated to navigate all the different threads and paths through them to determine exactly the right set of webmention targets for a given reply or other interaction. Bridgy is pretty good at it at this point, but when things get complicated, it defaults to being "promiscuous," ie it errs on the side of sending too many webmentions, rather than too few and possibly missing one.

In this case, since threads are common on Mastodon etc, and this was from the same author as the original post that linked to you, Bridgy interprets it as a follow-up that should probably be included with the original. To that end, it includes a u-in-reply-to link to the original post, and only a u-mention-of link to your web page.

Still complicated, I know. Sorry for the confusion!

@Oblomov
Copy link
Author

Oblomov commented Nov 11, 2024

No problem. The weird thing is that I'm not seeing a webmention for the original comment, although that might be because I was still working on the implementation on my side when the comment was written so I missed it. We can close this issue for me, unless you'd prefer to keep it open for reference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants