Lab1 Exercise 8

[BertLisser]

The only thing I found:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty
honest = [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y]
dishonest = [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)]

Better is:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty
honest =nub  [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y]
dishonest =nub  [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)]

Well done!

[olimoli9160]

Dear Bert, This snippet appears to come from the implementation I made in my personal folder. Is this feedback for the personal repository of member 11784873 - Michael Olivari or for the team's submission? Because the team submission code is slightly different from the implementation I made. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 10:59, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The only thing I found:

…

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest = [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest = [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Better is:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest =nub [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest =nub [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Well done! — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-le2HYjQAA4rSQTZR4mwYTsdcAUBks5sijxQgaJpZM4PYrkw>.

[BertLisser]

Dear Michael I cannot find your submission. Where I have to look? Bert Bert

…

----- Original Message ----- From: "olimoli9160" <[email protected]> To: "software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13" <[email protected]> Cc: "Bert Lisser" <[email protected]>, "Author" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 11:13:02 AM Subject: Re: [software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13] Lab1 Exercise 8 (#1) Dear Bert, This snippet appears to come from the implementation I made in my personal folder. Is this feedback for the personal repository of member 11784873 - Michael Olivari or for the team's submission? Because the team submission code is slightly different from the implementation I made. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 10:59, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The only thing I found:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest = [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest = [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Better is:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest =nub [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest =nub [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Well done! — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-le2HYjQAA4rSQTZR4mwYTsdcAUBks5sijxQgaJpZM4PYrkw>.

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1 (comment)

[olimoli9160]

Dear Bert, Our team's submission is in the Team directory -> folder 1 of the repository ST2017_WG_13. Our personal repositories are in the Members directory, but those weren't intended to be graded. Of course, feedback on our personal work is always appreciated. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 11:56, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear Michael I cannot find your submission. Where I have to look? Bert Bert

…

----- Original Message ----- From: "olimoli9160" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Bert Lisser" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Author" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 11:13:02 AM Subject: Re: [software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13] Lab1 Exercise 8 (#1) Dear Bert, This snippet appears to come from the implementation I made in my personal folder. Is this feedback for the personal repository of member 11784873 - Michael Olivari or for the team's submission? Because the team submission code is slightly different from the implementation I made. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 10:59, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The only thing I found:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest = [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest = [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Better is:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest =nub [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest =nub [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Well done! — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-le2HYjQAA4rSQTZR4mwYTsdcAUBks5sijxQgaJpZM4PYrkw>.

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1 (comment) — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-n3LX2VUNoDhCjafJxDlOYFV_qJtks5sikmugaJpZM4PYrkw>.

[BertLisser]

I found it. But where is the function "guilty"? I found the function "thief" with a different signature, however that was not the question.

…

----- Original Message ----- From: "olimoli9160" <[email protected]> To: "software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13" <[email protected]> Cc: "Bert Lisser" <[email protected]>, "Author" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 12:05:29 PM Subject: Re: [software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13] Lab1 Exercise 8 (#1) Dear Bert, Our team's submission is in the Team directory -> folder 1 of the repository ST2017_WG_13. Our personal repositories are in the Members directory, but those weren't intended to be graded. Of course, feedback on our personal work is always appreciated. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 11:56, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear Michael I cannot find your submission. Where I have to look? Bert Bert

----- Original Message ----- From: "olimoli9160" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Bert Lisser" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Author" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 11:13:02 AM Subject: Re: [software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13] Lab1 Exercise 8 (#1) Dear Bert, This snippet appears to come from the implementation I made in my personal folder. Is this feedback for the personal repository of member 11784873 - Michael Olivari or for the team's submission? Because the team submission code is slightly different from the implementation I made. Best, Michael On 15 Sep 2017, at 10:59, BertLisser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The only thing I found:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest = [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest = [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Better is:

-- Those boys who are honest are the ones that have true accusations to those boys who are guilty honest =nub [ x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, accuses x y] dishonest =nub [x | x <- boys, y <- guilty, not (accuses x y)] Well done! — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-le2HYjQAA4rSQTZR4mwYTsdcAUBks5sijxQgaJpZM4PYrkw>.

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1 (comment) — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANeV-n3LX2VUNoDhCjafJxDlOYFV_qJtks5sikmugaJpZM4PYrkw>.

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1 (comment)

[AJGHM-Khonraad]

Hi Bert,

I can understand where your confusion is at. Maybe you could have a look at

https://github.com/software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_13/blob/master/Members/11424907-ToineKhonraad/1/Lab1_Exercise8.hs

We apparently had to agree as a team on the submission dynamics, and will do so for the next coming weeks. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Toine

[PaulSpencer]

this appears to be my fault. I must have misread the question and not realized that one had to have exactly that signature, I thought it was about getting the correct result.
going forward, do we have to follow the exact signatures?

[BertLisser]

Yes. That is the first thing to what I glanced: are the types and names correct.