Lab 6

[BertLisser]

Ex. 4
I don't understand the sentence:

We notice that with k = 2, the chance that 9 is the least composite significantly decreases, as we would have to pick 8 twice when selecting a.

What about 'k=3' and I miss the report of the results.

The report of
Ex 5.

We therefore usually see the first carmichael number as a false positive.

and
Ex 6.

With primeCheckMR, we see that the result is 56052361 more often than our first carmichael number 294409, found with the previous exercise.

is too vague. Why not reporting the data like

Method	K = 1	K = 2	K = 3	K = 4
Composites	9	9	9	85
Carmichael	294409	294409	294409	294409
Miller-Rabin	294409	118901521	118901521	57060521336809