You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like there were some concurrency related bugs fixed between clang 11 and clang 13. (discussion)
I'm a little hesitant to make such a big change* without testing infrastructure... Ideally, we'd have at least some testing with sanitizers + on higher core count machines, whereas GitHub Action's default runners are relatively underpowered at 2 vCPUs. 😐
It seems like there were some concurrency related bugs fixed between clang 11 and clang 13. (discussion)
I'm a little hesitant to make such a big change* without testing infrastructure... Ideally, we'd have at least some testing with sanitizers + on higher core count machines, whereas GitHub Action's default runners are relatively underpowered at 2 vCPUs. 😐
Maybe we can do it smaller pieces:
The "investigate" in the title is deliberate; this issue isn't a commitment to upgrade to LLVM 13.
*The merge may be small, but there is a chance around broken invariants, or some random null pointers in places where they weren't coming up before.