Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RSS feed broken formatting #6

Open
Victor239 opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

RSS feed broken formatting #6

Victor239 opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@Victor239
Copy link

The feed available at https://spacestation14.com/index.xml used to be properly formatted and readable, but since the update in the last 24h the formatting is all broken.

@PJB3005
Copy link
Member

PJB3005 commented Apr 1, 2024

I guess updating Hugo must've done that. I'll take a look.

@PJB3005
Copy link
Member

PJB3005 commented Apr 1, 2024

I just compared the latest file with the one from 3 months ago and I can see no such formatting changes. The extent of the changes is:

  1. Switching to spacestation14.com, because I switched the website domain. To be expected.
  2. Use of more XML entities like <, which are completely valid.
  3. Additions of some atom metadata.

@Victor239
Copy link
Author

About 50 items got redelivered when the update occurred, so I still have the old copies in my RSS reader.

For the feed item https://spacestation14.com/post/22-11-30-progress-report-38/:

Old copy:

image

Today's version:

image

@PJB3005
Copy link
Member

PJB3005 commented Apr 1, 2024

This is a bug in your RSS reader not ignoring HTML <template> tags, as those shouldn't be displayed by default.

@Victor239
Copy link
Author

Ah I see what the interaction is. Because the full blog post isn't included in the RSS feed I use a Readability-based plugin to import the full post into my RSS reader, and that doesn't strip <template> tags currently.

@PJB3005
Copy link
Member

PJB3005 commented Apr 2, 2024

If there's a simple change we could do to fix it (like setting display=none on it) then I wouldn't mind accepting it, though I don't really feel like pushing various test versions for that purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants