perf: cache doctor beads dir resolution#2643
Closed
osamu2001 wants to merge 2 commits intosteveyegge:mainfrom
Closed
perf: cache doctor beads dir resolution#2643osamu2001 wants to merge 2 commits intosteveyegge:mainfrom
osamu2001 wants to merge 2 commits intosteveyegge:mainfrom
Conversation
❌ 1 Tests Failed:
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time
To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
steveyegge
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2026
Cache ResolveBeadsDirForRepo results so the git worktree fallback lookup runs once per doctor invocation instead of 28 times. Co-Authored-By: osamu2001 <osamu2001@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
|
Fix-merged to main in 389f979. Thank you @osamu2001! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Testing
Context
This is a follow-up to the review on #2617 after that branch had effectively already landed in main.