Changed the recommended library for JWT Authentication in Django to strawberry-django-auth

[pkrakesh]

Changed the JWT library recommendation from strawberry-django-jwt to strawberry-django-auth in the documentation as the old library is unmaintained and recommends using the latter library by itself.

Summary by Sourcery

Change the recommended JWT authentication library in the Django documentation to 'strawberry-django-auth' as the previous library is no longer maintained.

Documentation:

• Update the recommended library for JWT authentication in Django documentation from 'strawberry-django-jwt' to 'strawberry-django-auth' due to the former being unmaintained.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the documentation to recommend a new library for JWT Authentication in Django. The change replaces the old recommendation of 'strawberry-django-jwt' with 'strawberry-django-auth' due to maintenance issues with the former library.

No sequence diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated JWT library recommendation in the authentication documentation	Replaced 'strawberry-django-jwt' with 'strawberry-django-auth' Updated the GitHub link to point to the new recommended library	docs/guide/authentication.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @pkrakesh - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟡 Documentation: 2 issues found

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

nitpick (documentation): Minor grammatical error in unchanged text: 'doesn't have' should be 'don't have'.

[Ckk3]

Thanks for your contribution, @pkrakesh !
I checked the code and looks good to me!
Lets wait @patrick91 @bellini666 check it out too😉.

[bellini666]

Thanks! 😊